the graph shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010.
The line graph illustrate the amount of 5 food items(vegetable ,fruit, meat, bread ,seafood) consumed in Australia between 1950 and 2010. Overall, the consumption of some food increased where as some had a sharp decline in the consumption and seafood showing minimal changes. Units are measured in kg per person per year.
At the start of period, bread was the most popular till 2nd decades, along side fruit which also showed a decline after the first decade, Vegetables and meat being the less popular food item it showed sharp decline till the 2nd decades and till the first decade respectively, seafood showing less trends.
With regards to the amount of bread consumed till 1970 was almost 70kg and then fell to almost 50kg till the year 2000 after this it began to rose. Likewise, 90kg of fruit was consumed till 1960 before falling to 80kg in the year 1970 and then dramatically increasing to 140.
On the other hand, vegetables was the most fluctuated food item, stared with a dip to 120kg till the year 1970 before rising again to 140kg in the year 1980, getting declined again to 120kg in the 1990 and then increasing dramatically to 160 in the year 2010. The 2nd most fluctuated food item was meat, started with decline which was in between 90kg-99kg in the year 1950, and then increases till 100kg in the year 1970 before dropping in the year 1980 which was same as 1950, started increasing again to almost 120kg before continuing falling till the year 2010 to almost 80kg
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 84
- the graph shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rate the amount of 5 food itemsvegetable ,fruit, meat, bread ,seafood consumed in...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food itemsvegetable ,fruit, meat, bread ,seafood consumed in Australia between 1...
^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...food itemsvegetable ,fruit, meat, bread ,seafood consumed in Australia between 19...
^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... the consumption of some food increased where as some had a sharp decline in the consump...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
... was the most popular till 2nd decades, along side fruit which also showed a decline after...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trends is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...st decade respectively, seafood showing less trends. With regards to the amount o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, likewise, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76061776062 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34550185034 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455598455598 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.1268861259 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.125 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.375 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214429548988 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108445036858 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125125269039 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150779743368 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148435509232 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.