The charts illustrate how people in a specific European nation spent on 6 types of categories in 1958 and in 2008.
Overall, there was an increase in the proportion of total expenditure on luxury goods, accommodation, travel/transport, whereas the figures for food, clothing and recreation collectively decreased in a particular European country in those years. Additionally, the percentage of expenditure on food experienced the most dramatical rise.
In 1958, the rate of money spent on food was highest, at 32%, while the figure for clothing was significantly lower, at 18%. The proportions of budget allocated for housing and entertainment accounted for 22% and 13% respectively. At the same time, people in the nation examined paid around 7% of their budget for each luxury products and transportation.
In 2008, the share of money allocated for accommodation sharply increased to 32% and became the highest figure in the chart. Similarly, the figures for lavish items and commuting rose to the same rate, at 17%. By contrast, the country surveyed witnessed decreases to 16%, 12%, and 6% in the percentage of expenditure on clothing, food and entertainment respectively.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 78
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is to a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 89
- Discuss the arguments for and against raising pets 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37297297297 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33170352169 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5777723604 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201436125682 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818194073046 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850245571522 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142779666717 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782377453033 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.