The reading and lecture are both about the company policy which should be made compulsory for the employee. It states that company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the company in return. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions this policy is ineffective for employee as well as company itself and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that company’s profit will burgeon since the employee would feel relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In addition, company can hire the staffs who works the same amount of work at only 80% of their normal pay. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends it would be more expensive to hire the additional staff since it requires more sum for training, office space, equipment and so on. Therefore, for days work plan seems not to be advantageous.
Secondly, according to the writer, this policy lessen the umployment rates creating more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities. The speaker on other hand points out that employing new staff would be costly so the boss could ask their employee to work extra hour and consequently expectation rises towards employee.
Finally, the reading passage notes that the policy of four day works aid employee with more free time which eventually enhance their living standard. Furthermore, they can spend their sapre time with their families and in whatever task they like to do. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they would become lazy rather than being creative. He goes on to say that due to economic downturn, probability of their promotion would be low.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds very conflicting views on four days a week work policy. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
The reading and lecture are both about the company policy which should be made compulsory for the employee. It states that company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the company in return. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions this policy is ineffective for employee as well as company itself and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that company’s profit will burgeon since the employee would feel relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In addition, company can hire the staffs who works the same amount of work at only 80% of their normal pay. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends it would be more expensive to hire the additional staff since it requires more sum for training, office space, equipment and so on. Therefore, for days work plan seems not to be advantageous.
Secondly, according to the writer, this policy lessen the umployment rates creating more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities. The speaker on other hand points out that employing new staff would be costly so the boss could ask their employee to work extra hour and consequently expectation rises towards employee.
Finally, the reading passage notes that the policy of four day works aid employee with more free time which eventually enhance their living standard. Furthermore, they can spend their sapre time with their families and in whatever task they like to do. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they would become lazy rather than being creative. He goes on to say that due to economic downturn, probability of their promotion would be low.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds very conflicting views on four days a week work policy. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
The reading and lecture are both about the company policy which should be made compulsory for the employee. It states that company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the company in return. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions this policy is ineffective for employee as well as company itself and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that company’s profit will burgeon since the employee would feel relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In addition, company can hire the staffs who works the same amount of work at only 80% of their normal pay. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends it would be more expensive to hire the additional staff since it requires more sum for training, office space, equipment and so on. Therefore, for days work plan seems not to be advantageous.
Secondly, according to the writer, this policy lessen the umployment rates creating more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities. The speaker on other hand points out that employing new staff would be costly so the boss could ask their employee to work extra hour and consequently expectation rises towards employee.
Finally, the reading passage notes that the policy of four day works aid employee with more free time which eventually enhance their living standard. Furthermore, they can spend their sapre time with their families and in whatever task they like to do. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they would become lazy rather than being creative. He goes on to say that due to economic downturn, probability of their promotion would be low.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds very conflicting views on four days a week work policy. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 71 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 71 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 61 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 71
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 8, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 5.04856512141 555% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 22.412803532 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 30.3222958057 237% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 5.01324503311 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3318.0 1373.03311258 242% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 676.0 270.72406181 250% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90828402367 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09901951359 4.04702891845 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49971988207 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.270710059172 0.540411800872 50% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 419.366225166 238% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 18.0 8.23620309051 219% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 13.0662251656 291% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0906268894 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3157894737 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.39473684211 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 4.33554083885 415% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 4.45695364238 314% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469695117855 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146583404881 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178589304895 0.0662205650399 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2768366143 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.266326608585 0.0443174109184 601% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.14 8.42419426049 73% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 8, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 5.04856512141 555% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 22.412803532 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 30.3222958057 237% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 5.01324503311 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3318.0 1373.03311258 242% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 676.0 270.72406181 250% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90828402367 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09901951359 4.04702891845 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49971988207 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.270710059172 0.540411800872 50% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 419.366225166 238% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 18.0 8.23620309051 219% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 13.0662251656 291% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0906268894 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3157894737 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.39473684211 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 4.33554083885 415% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 4.45695364238 314% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469695117855 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146583404881 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178589304895 0.0662205650399 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2768366143 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.266326608585 0.0443174109184 601% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.14 8.42419426049 73% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the c...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l relaxed and will be less error at work by working only four days in a week. In ...
^^
Line 8, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ing more jobs. To be more precise, when full time worker adapted to four day work policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work policy then the work can be shifted to other ensuring more job opportunities...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 5.04856512141 555% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 22.412803532 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 30.3222958057 237% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 5.01324503311 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3318.0 1373.03311258 242% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 676.0 270.72406181 250% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90828402367 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09901951359 4.04702891845 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49971988207 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.270710059172 0.540411800872 50% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 419.366225166 238% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 18.0 8.23620309051 219% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 13.0662251656 291% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0906268894 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3157894737 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.39473684211 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.09492273731 244% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 4.33554083885 415% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 4.45695364238 314% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469695117855 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146583404881 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178589304895 0.0662205650399 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2768366143 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.266326608585 0.0443174109184 601% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.14 8.42419426049 73% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.