Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the Chaco Canyon settlements in New mexico which is also referred as great houses. Although there are not any evidences, the author of the reading proposes the theories that supports how these houses were used back then. The lecturer disagrees with the explanation. He mentions that the archeologist’s viewpoints are not convincing and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that the Chaco houses are used as a residential home for tons of people . In addition, these buildings are identical to native big apartment. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the wrter’s position. He contends that is the houses has enough space for hundreds of people then why there are few fire places which is sufficient for merely ten families. Thus, the houses are not seem to be residential.
Secondly, according to the reading passage, Chaco houses has features that are applicable for storing grains such as maize. To be more precise, since the space is big it can be used for keeping the crop and most importantly without any defects on it. The speaker on other hand points out that, there are no any traces of grains spilled on ground. Not only this if the houses are used to keep crops then why there are not even a single containter for it. Therefore, it is clear that the buildings are not used for storage purpose.
Finally, the reading passage notes that the apartments are used for ceremonial purpose. There are some evidence of broken pots found in the extraction of mound which might be of special ceremony. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that the scattered materials might remain there during constructing large buildings. Hence, it is not applicable to conclude that the buildings are used for ceremonial uses.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds very conflicting views on the Chaco houses. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 76
- young people have no influence on important decision that determine the future of the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as a residential home for tons of people . In addition, these buildings are identi...
^^
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
... ten families. Thus, the houses are not seem to be residential. Secondly, according...
^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...n other hand points out that, there are no any traces of grains spilled on ground....
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... idea that the scattered materials might remain there during constructing large b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.4613686534 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96696696697 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6184376472 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528528528529 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1859320572 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7619047619 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116133914519 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324218255037 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304792605516 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612526276215 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387852066034 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.