The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of different activities done by maturities a day in one country between 1958 and 2008.
What stands out from the graph is that there were two opposite trends. While working, traveling to work and relaxing at home had a tendency of going up, going out with friends and family and sleeping witnessed a downward trend. In addition, sleeping and working were the main activities of adult people in one day in both years.
In 1958, starting at a quite high point, the percentage of working hours ranked the first at 33%, followed by the data of sleeping hours and going out with friends and family at 32% and 19% respectively. Over the period of 50 years, working was still the activity with the highest percentage of adults at 42% in a day and bounced to a fourth. By contrast, the rate of sleeping and going out with friends or family experienced a downward trend to 25% and 6% respectively during the same period..
Turning to the other three activities, Traveling to work accounted for 2% in 1958. However, in 2008, this figure leapt substantially to 8% which was four times higher than it was 50 years ago. Similarly, relaxing at home activity experienced the same upward trend from 8% to 13%. Surprisingly, the figure for other activities like hobbies or playing sports stayed the same throughout the period shown.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oportion of different activities done by maturities a day in one country between ...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs ranked the first at 33%, followed by the data of sleeping hours and going out...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d 6% respectively during the same period.. Turning to the other three activities...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79574468085 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66151078449 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2536536563 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165680369296 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710476790262 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740763827066 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122192388187 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659022459508 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.