Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past.Why is that so? Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
It is believed that informal language now is more commonly used in modern time than in the past. This phenomenon occurs as the result of the development of language in the contemporary generations and the prevalence of Internet and social media networks. I am inclined to the view that this occurrence brings more drawbacks than benefits in many aspects of life.
The trend of growing less formal language is happening due to 2 prime reasons. First and foremost, spoken language is much more preferable and easier to communicate in daily life. The reason for this inclination is that formality in language requires rules which are complex and adequate knowledge of the topic, consequently, using informal language is a way of avoiding mistakes in word using and grammar. Admittedly, the advent of Internet and social media platforms have generated outstanding changes in life, one of which is informal communication. There is a bunch of terms coined on the Internet as slangs and abbreviated words utilized in the light of their convenience. Most of social media platforms now attribute emojis and icons as a better way to express feelings and ideas.
However, the widespread use of informal language brings 2 primarily negative drawbacks. Firstly, the use of spoken language in school environment could affect the academic performances of pupils. These students can utilize less formal forms of language in their thesis or dissertation. This action sometimes shows less respect to markers, therefore, low results in academy is liable to inevitable. Additionally, informal language leads to less effective communication in particular contexts, especially, in enterprises. The utilization of this can show the disrespect to counterparts, which then influence to contracts between companies, and also break the validity of the documents, therefore, firms and individuals cannot reach their goals and profit.
In conclusion, the prevalence of spoken language occurs due to the devolving of language and the arrival of Internet and social media platforms. However, the widespread of this kind of language results in further drawbacks than benefits in academy and business context.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-14 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | trucvy112233 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | trucvy112233 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 73
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 67
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 67
- The graph and chart below give information on the average daily maximum and minimum temperatures in degrees Celsius and the average number of days with rainfall each month for two Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44837758112 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02505900421 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8099525989 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.647058824 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271573602474 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857181737284 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518566252047 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167611602293 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498438000916 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44837758112 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02505900421 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8099525989 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.647058824 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271573602474 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857181737284 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518566252047 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167611602293 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498438000916 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.