The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050.
The given table illustrates how the number of people change in 4 countries (Argentina, Indonesia, Italy and Republic of Korea) from 2003 to 2050.
In general, it is clear that the increasing tendency in population is seen in Argentina, Indonesia and Republic of Korea, while the number of residents in Italy decreased gradually. Moreover, the Indonesia’s population consistently has the highest figures throughout the year.
The number of citizens of Indonesia started at 238 million, after which it is predicted to rise sharply by 36 million people in the year 2025. Similarly, the figures for Argentina is probable to climb from 34 million to 48 million from 2003 to 2025. By the end of the period (2050), the population of these 2 countries is likely to continuously go up to 312 million and 62 million people respectively.
54 million people were the population of Italy in 2003, which is then forecast to slightly decline to 45 million in the year 2050. In the contrary, the figures for Republic of Korea’s residents is considered increasing by 4 million from 48 million people in 2003, which is probable to level off until 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The graph and the table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK University in 1987 and 2007 84
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, similarly, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98952879581 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89698690011 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1380525268 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230876794089 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113463826987 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070834674824 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143789636153 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398782094717 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.