Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shadow of a doubt in all societies there are some rules for all people should obey. As a matter of fact, also these regulations affect the youth's life. Some people believe young people have more freedom than their parents and ancestors. I, however, think society’s rules are too rigid for younger people which I will explain in the following.
The first and foremost reason coming to my mind is that most of the rule’s society considered is out of date for the younger ones. In other words, the laws and rules are based on their parent’s old perspective of the world. So, over time many lives situation change, and most regulations are not dynamic or designed for the next generation, it seems these rules are restrictive. The first example I remember is the regulations about the way people wear clothes in my country that is obligatory for people to wear suitable cloth which the governor approved for them many years ago, the people in the past accepted this condition. But the younger people directly did not agree with the interference of the government on what they wore then this created conflict between the state and the youth. This year younger people for three-month fighting for their rights regarding what they want to wear or do without government interference. Besides updating these rules and all strict ones based on today’s subjects were other demands of them.
Another worthy reason is that the rules contrast younger people's privacy. Especially, younger people are in a period of time in their life they want to experience a lot of things such as to have relationships, to go travel, to be with their friends for the whole night, to search for everything they have questions about. Thus, the regulations of each country or their families can influence these experiences and some laws about control which the younger ones do. Also, their parents want them to limit their friendships or the time spent with friends alone. An article printed in one sociology journal last year talked about restrictions on younger people's privacy in some cases showing diverse results. As analyzed in the two thousand cases which separate two individual groups half of the younger people without knowing about this research control and restrict about time can spend outdoors. Another group did not have any restrictions. After gathering data from cases was observed the first group have more conflict with their parents and they did anything to get rid of this limitation, even some of them lied to spend more time outside of their houses with their friends and do everything they wants without monitoring.
In conclusion, there are more reasons for undynamic today's rules for youth but I mentioned two important equal values. The rules are outdated and also affect younger people's life privacy. So, I suggest that parents and society should consider the new generation's concern for decreasing restrictive conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...fact, also these regulations affect the youths life. Some people believe young people ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lives'' or 'life's'?
Suggestion: lives'; life's
...ective of the world. So, over time many lives situation change, and most regulations ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cy. Especially, younger people are in a period of time in their life they want to experience a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1202, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
...th their friends and do everything they wants without monitoring. In conclusion, the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for decreasing restrictive conditions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, thus, as to, even so, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03073770492 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54020926197 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493852459016 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4784951987 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.590909091 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150904755749 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554254813635 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374757268795 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113359420564 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343483102691 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.