It is argued that raising the price of fuel is the most effective measure to address the problems of the environment. While this approach can potentially reduce the amount of harmful fumes in the atmosphere, I maintain that strict laws and a global awareness campaign would be more feasible solutions.
Undoubtedly, increasing the fuel price can reduce the amount of emissions in the air. In reality, private vehicles release a significant amount of noxious fumes into the air on a daily basis, which contaminates the air. By increasing the cost of fuel, a vehicle driver would need to consider the distance and the frequency of their journeys on the roads. If they need to travel, they might turn to other more effective and greener transportation, including buses or electric bikes. For example, a study published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology found that a 10% increase in gasoline prices led to a 4% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from passenger cars.
However, increasing the fuel price does not fully address the underlying causes of environmental problems. In reality, environmental issues can stem from various factors, such as industrial waste disposal to the water and land or poor awareness of residents. Therefore, imposing strict laws and penalties for any manufacturers discarding their waste directly into the sea without a treatment system, would serve as an effective deterrent against irresponsible disposal of waste. Additionally, running a world-wide campaign to raise people’s awareness about the importance of environmental protection. For instance, the “ActNow” campaign of the United Nations in 2020 encouraged over 20 million users to take action to reduce their carbon footprint through small changes in their daily lives such as using public buses or subways instead of private cars, reducing the use of plastic bags. As a result, the environment would be cleaner and fresher.
In conclusion, although raising the cost of fuel can deal with a certain part of the environmental issues by discouraging private vehicles, I believe that stricter laws and punishment and a world-wide awareness campaign would be ideal solutions. I am also convinced that once these measures are implemented, the environment-related issues will be dealt with, making a significant contribution to protecting the Earth.
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 84
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people feel that it will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used Others are not in the favour of the same Discuss both the point of views and give your opinion 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42391304348 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1320902552 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1425713525 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.066666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132711181026 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519673334786 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549765670691 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827969764721 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116337023008 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42391304348 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1320902552 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1425713525 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.066666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132711181026 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519673334786 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549765670691 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827969764721 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116337023008 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.