The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare how much energy production was created in a region between 1983 and 2003.
What stands out from the graph is that while the percentage of Hydropower remains unchanged, other energies had fluctuations over 20 years. Besides, Oil was the energy which was generated most during the period shown.
Looking at the graph for more details, The proportion of oil made up the highest figure at 42% in 1993, then it continued its downward trend in the next 20 years, with 38% but it still ranked at the high point. Following that, Coal had the same trend as oil, the figure for coal contributed 23% at the beginning but then declined markedly by 10% in 2003.
On the other hand, the proportion of Nuclear power made up 20% but after 20 years, it started growing up moderately to approximately three-quarters at the end of the period. Similarly, Natural Gas also went up from 11% to 21% over the 20 years but instead of decreasing or rising, Hydropower stood in its place during the period given at 4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, look, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71111111111 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55854897149 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3315388767 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924444034874 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512800500584 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543113608105 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749493865225 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629345185524 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.