When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
What is beyond dispute is that endless debate regarding the use of a new technological device, in modern society, not only causes broad public concern but also provokes a hot topic among private individuals. Some cling to the perspective that we are supposed to buy it instantly. In theory, perhaps as objective and attractive as their claim seems, but in practice, what they suggest cannot bear close analysis. Consequently, without hesitation, I hold the view that taking time is as indispensable as a lighthouse, which directs the navigators in the vast sea.
What appears as the first factor is that we do need a transition after the birth of high-tech devices. To be more specific, if we apply the news as quickly as possible, we will suffer from their imperfect functions and even defects that may injure our property. This point cannot be better and further illustrated by the example from one of my intimate classmates, Lihao. As a wild fan, he used to purchase all the new devices that almost did not get the certificates. There were lots of times that he had to pay for the troubles-e.g., a poor quality which made him buy another one. Apparently, it may inform us that the more sophisticated it is, the more time we need to wait.
Most importantly, the application of the merchandise which have been adopted can give consumers better service. Precisely, after collecting users' data comprehensively, we do not need to worry about there being something too difficult for all children and adults to take advantage of. In other words, the bugs that may bother the customers have already been fixed. A case in point is that, as a senior student, I often complain about our school curriculum system, which was just built for one month. Because of this, we have to face the situation that our statistical credit system is in a mess.
Time is to a new high-quality device as the market is to economic development in countries. We cannot fail to take the must transition for granted before the utilization of new elaborate devices. Just as Shakespeare has put it, "Strong reasons lead to strong actions."
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, e.g., first, if, may, regarding, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87257617729 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92591330784 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612188365651 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6830445643 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7222222222 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138368040279 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408958453277 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262972058704 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773558702508 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100111038339 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.