The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the percentage of energy created from 5 different sources ( hydropower, oil, nuclear power, natural gas ) in a particular country between 1982 and 2003.
The initial impression from the charts is that oil is the most popular mineral exploited for producing energy in both mentioned years despite a moderate drop. Moreover, this nation also generated more nuclear power and natural gas by 2003.
Looking at the charts for more details, oil energy ranked the first place with nearly a half of the total energy , which was twice higher than the second largest energy-coal with 23% .20 years later , the amount of oil and coal both saw a fall, especially energy from coal, which reduced by 10%.
In contrast, there was a reverse pattern in the use of power and natural gas. These increased by 4% and 10% respectively to surpass the manufacture of coal energy. On the other hand, hydropower kept being the smallest amount all over the years mentioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 11
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 44
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 Summarize the formation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Y 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sources'' or 'source's'?
Suggestion: sources'; source's
...tage of energy created from 5 different sources hydropower, oil, nuclear power, natura...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... energy created from 5 different sources hydropower, oil, nuclear power, natural ...
^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropower, oil, nuclear power, natural gas in a particular country between 1982 and...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e with nearly a half of the total energy , which was twice higher than the second ...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...est energy-coal with 23% .20 years later , the amount of oil and coal both saw a f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98170731707 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47226596433 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65243902439 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5725232541 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145332405989 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584356477822 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623676128821 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931855220858 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608052880229 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.