Topic: Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce. Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects?
With the prosperity of modern society, there are more and more cutting-edge technologies that are applied to every aspect of human life. In fact, thanks to advanced machines, big companies can minimize numerous expenditures as well as improve working efficiency. However, this way may lead to the expansion of substituting for the human workforce. From my perspective, I contend that this trend will bring significant benefits on a large scale considering how they are less error-prone than humans.
One major ground behind the rising of the opinion that robots and other automation may replace a huge amount of the workforce is a fear of being unemployed in the foreseeable future. Due to not being hampered by any physical or mental limits, they are experiencing an ideal condition to rapidly undertake most tasks at a rate absolutely faster than humans. Being acknowledged this advantage, a plethora of corporations started investing a huge budget in arming with state-of-art technology, and robots as a substitute for workers to facilitate productivity. This can be seen in some convenience stores in developed countries where human cashiers have been replaced with self-checkout machines that aid consumers in purchasing their items faster. Consequently, some people consider it as an adverse side effect as it directly threatened job opportunities for incompetent workers.
Nonetheless, computers gaining more intelligence than humans may help reduce mistakes. As computers, today are programmed with algorithms to accomplish particular tasks repetitively, they are likely to make far fewer errors. Therefore, many companies utilize these machines to ensure a steady production of their goods while maintaining quality standards. This is evident with the use of sorting robots in the logistics industry in China. Machines there are tasked with precisely assigning items to their designated parcels and they can do this at a rate of 18,000 per hour with a much lower margin of error in comparison to that of humans. Thus, computers gaining superior intelligence over humans is a positive development as it improves product quality and facilitates business growth.
In conclusion, despite the legitimate concerns related to computers curtailing the need for human workers, I contend that this phenomenon is a positive development since computers are less susceptible to errors generally. Once human beings are aware of the challenges computers pose, they can take action to control the risks presented by such disruptive technologies
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Charles Le | 90 | view |
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Topic Some people say team sports football have lots of benefits Others say Individual sports swimming tennis are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their children Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Topic technology has developed rapidly in the last century Do you think its development is slowing now Why or why not 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5358974359 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10892016871 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612820512821 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4589586574 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114761398892 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334534056026 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028123803881 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639054479935 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212027628621 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5358974359 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10892016871 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612820512821 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4589586574 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114761398892 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334534056026 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028123803881 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639054479935 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212027628621 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.