Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
The government money resources are limited, so, it is important to decide carefully where to spend this limited funding. Personally, I believe that government should expend money to enhance Intenet access than to improve public transportation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, by enhancing internet access, the need for public transportation will decrease. Many people commute because they have to do in order to do some tasks which can be done by a reliable internet access. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Two years ago, I was working as personal trainer and I had to go to gym by bus every day. Sometimes I tried to train people on a video call but it was not successful due to poor internet conection. But a significant enhancement began to apply on the internet connection. So I started to use video calls instead of going to the gym. In this way, my need to buses was eliminated.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that paying more attention to internet access rather than public transportation benefits larger number of people. This is because, due to various practical usages of the Internet, the number of people who use it is much greater than people who use public transportation. Although some people use the public transportation, some people go to different places using their own car, and many people do not go anywhere on a regular basis and always stay home as well. But all three group of mentioned people use the Internet.
In conclusion, I believe that government spending more more money on enhancing internet access is more crucial rather than on public transportation because larger number of users and the impacts that improving internet access will have on need to public tarnsportation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People learn more by watching television than by reading books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers salaries Use reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o, I was working as personal trainer and I had to go to gym by bus every day. Som...
^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...ion, I believe that government spending more more money on enhancing internet access is m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...ion, I believe that government spending more more money on enhancing internet access is m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial rather than on public transportation because larger number of users and the i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98692810458 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93484430927 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532679738562 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8883623883 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330031903715 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100787685917 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110669561688 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231971033334 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110783180792 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.