Ecotourism as a possible solution for ameliorating the conditions of rainforest area and its people.
The author in this reading suggests ecotourism as a possible solution to ameliorate the present conditions of the rainforest and the people inhabiting it. The lecture, on the other hand, doesn't agree with the author and states that ecotourism has failed to solve the problems and instead exaggerates them.First, the reading suggests that ecotourism can bring prosperity to a country and will also lead to the preservation of resources. However, the lecturer's stance is that ecotourism will instead damage rainforests by exposing them to more people and this will also cause neglecting nature for one's own profit.Second, the author puts forth the argument that ecotourism will raise awareness of global resource reservation and the maintenance of ecological balance. But this argument is challenged by the speaker, who states that people living in forests are already aware of the conservation of forest resources.Finally, it is pointed out in the article that ecotourism will promote a sense of pride among residents, but the lecture states that it could lead to a feeling of inferiority complex among the people of the rainforest area as they will have to rely on their gratitude. Instead, they should learn to be self-sufficient.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing it. The lecture, on the other hand, doesnt agree with the author and states that e...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...e problems and instead exaggerates them.First, the reading suggests that ecotourism c...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...preservation of resources. However, the lecturers stance is that ecotourism will instead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 613, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...e neglecting nature for ones own profit.Second, the author puts forth the argument tha...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 914, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...of the conservation of forest resources.Finally, it is pointed out in the article that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09542124 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.52003706 49.2860985944 263% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.2 110.228320801 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 21.698381199 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303095791724 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16965885815 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181854962855 0.0662205650399 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303095791724 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.3589403974 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.0289183223 179% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing it. The lecture, on the other hand, doesnt agree with the author and states that e...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...e problems and instead exaggerates them.First, the reading suggests that ecotourism c...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...preservation of resources. However, the lecturers stance is that ecotourism will instead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 613, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...e neglecting nature for ones own profit.Second, the author puts forth the argument tha...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 914, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...of the conservation of forest resources.Finally, it is pointed out in the article that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09542124 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.52003706 49.2860985944 263% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.2 110.228320801 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 21.698381199 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303095791724 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16965885815 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181854962855 0.0662205650399 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303095791724 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.3589403974 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.0289183223 179% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.