Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the causes of diminishing of sea mammal called sea otter which are vital for coastal ecosystem. The author of the reading states that although there are probably two reasons for the declination of otter such as pollution or predation, it is suceptible to be seemed that pollution as a main factor behind the otter declination.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that chemical produced from industries are the foremost cause for environment degradation which has directly affect the number of sea otter and eventually the pollution has proved to be detrimental to their health. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that there has not been any evidence to prove the existence of dead otter in sea which means predator might have hunt the otter and eat instantly.
Secondly, according to the writing not only sea otter but also other sea mammals are affected by the pollution. Moreover, it is not the predation that hunt otter since they prefer to kill merely larger prey. The speaker on other hand points out that huge mammal such as whale are hunted by the human thus there are no option left for ocra. They change their diet and end up hunting small animal.
Finally, the reading passage notes that the uneven pattern might be the repercussion of environment pollution. This has caused otter pollution to mitigate to a great at certain location. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that pattern could be odd as hunting of ocra utterly depends on the accessible of the location. In addition, places where they can reach easily has otter population reduced vastly and on other since ocra cannot suffer shallow and dry location, the population remains the same.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting veiws on the causes of otter declination. The writer effectively challenges the professor’s claim made in the article.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they support or detract from the points made in the reading passage 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Some young children spend a grest amount of time practicing sports Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this Use specific reasons nad examples to support your answer 73
- Now summarize condense the points made in the lecture compose your response and clarify how they provide a reason to feel ambiguous about the points made in the perusing passage 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egradation which has directly affect the number of sea otter and eventually the p...
^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hunted'.
Suggestion: hunted
... in sea which means predator might have hunt the otter and eat instantly. Secondly,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pattern could be odd as hunting of ocra utterly depends on the accessible of the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.01324503311 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01230769231 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5886159515 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.412327466 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105202050419 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348039750266 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328901696185 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059993380404 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243949257959 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egradation which has directly affect the number of sea otter and eventually the p...
^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hunted'.
Suggestion: hunted
... in sea which means predator might have hunt the otter and eat instantly. Secondly,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pattern could be odd as hunting of ocra utterly depends on the accessible of the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.01324503311 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01230769231 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5886159515 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.412327466 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105202050419 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348039750266 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328901696185 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059993380404 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243949257959 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.