An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case, and what solutions are possible?
An enormous increase in consumer goods production leads to environmental damage. This essay will look at some primary causes of this and offer some possible solutions to the problem.
There are a number of reasons for the serious destruction of the environment. The first reason is the mass production of disposable goods and chemical by-products cause more toxic waste and emissions released from factories into nature. As a result, water, air, and soil are polluted which leads to the deaths of many plants and animals over the world. The second reason is that single-use products that are manufactured in response to customers’ increasing demands are non-biodegradable. Despite their short lifespan, these products can remain as waste for thousands of years, turning our planet into a huge landfill and threatening the living habitats of all species. For example, disposable plastic bags used for food packing are littered everywhere. They are mixed in soil and water and do not decompose, which results in preventing the creatures living there from respiring.
There are several actions that could be taken to mitigate the problem mentioned above. Firstly, the government should encourage manufacturers to use alternative materials and resources to fossil fuels that are eco-friendlier such as solar resources. This helps to reduce pollutant emissions released into the environment. Secondly, goods must be used for a long time before being removed. Technological goods, for instance, are the case in point. Using high-tech gadgets longer and recycling them helps to reduce the amount of waste from electronic components.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to the destruction of the natural environment and measures can be implemented to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
- Task 4 The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and for the same trade conference in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 84
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australia exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50545454545 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97271337222 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0649240354 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210577435648 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601811136663 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710428766279 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138609142383 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939642471288 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.