Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the present time, computers and mobile phones are becoming more and more popular. Some people said that trend poses a threat to the reading and writing skills of young people. While I agree that it can descend into a detrimental effect to some extent, these technology devices can become helpful tools for young people to improve their reading and writing skills.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that people spend more time typing on technology devices than using handwriting to write on paper. This may lead to handwriting will be declined if it is not practiced regularly. Consequently, in case it is compulsory to write a document by hand, for instance writing essays for the university entrance exam or writing a cover letter for a career change, it will be a disadvantage if others find it hard to read.
On the other hand, it is obvious that reading on computers and mobile phones still requires young people's ability to understand fully what the author means. Furthermore, there are some tools that can help people recognize their problems in vocabulary or grammar, so they can learn from that and avoid similar mistakes in the future. For example, the Grammarly application can check your typo and devise grammar with the explanation.
To summarize, though it is admitted that handwriting can be affected by the growth rate of the use of computers and mobile phones nowadays, I cannot deny its benefits in improving the reading and writing skills of young people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid 61
- Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.924 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63096940309 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0422564944 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357118831122 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139626000226 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102533273518 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218063127022 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917897541838 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.924 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63096940309 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0422564944 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357118831122 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139626000226 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102533273518 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218063127022 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917897541838 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.