The given line graph demonstrates the changes in the wheat exports in three countries every year for 5years. It is measured in million tonnes. Overall, what stands out from the line graph is that export in Canada remained almost the same despite fluctuating, whereas in two countries this index was different at all cause it saw an upward tendency in Europan Community and downward trend in Australia.
A more detailed look at the line graph reveals that at the beginning of the period 15-17 mln tonnes exported in Europan Community and Australia. In 1986, high of them decreased whereas the other rose. But surprisengly, there were slight increase in Europan Community again, making for more than 20 in 1990 while this ratio declined to just above 10 in Australia.
With the reference to wheat export in Canada, its level was more different than others, accounting for just under 20, firstly. Though first year witnessed a gradual fall, its indicator reached a peak in 1988, substituting for 25. Interestingly, it dipped to much less than 15. However, the number of wheat export was like first in 1990
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 84
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 84
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...very year for 5years. It is measured in million tonnes. Overall, what stands out from t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...in Canada, its level was more different than others, accounting for just under 20, f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...tuting for 25. Interestingly, it dipped to much less than 15. However, the number ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94086021505 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5942350506 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.5994582021 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186907232512 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663516385118 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728756073835 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125155545592 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647746825606 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.