One of the most noticeable trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that there are some parts in the world that has not enough recycling of waste material. There is a wide range of causes that attributes to this problem. In my opinion, this problem can be remedied by providing some effective measures are taken.
To begin with there is wide range factors that attribute to this problem. The most preponderant one is that lack of bins or dumps on social places. To elaborate it, there are some public places all around the world that does not contain bins on social sites for example bus stands, railway stations and gardens. As a result, individuals are throwing there refuses here and there. It cannot only contribute heaps of trash to but also leads to catastrophic in varied fields. Besides, lack of awareness and laws. To make it justifiable, there are some countries in world that are not implementing strict rules and regulation and not educating there citizens about waste material. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia between March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicates that less number of dustbins and insufficient intel about refuses are the biggest reasons why some nations are facing recycling problems. Needless to say, all these demerits have far reaching impacts on individuals health.
Steps to deal with this problem are many the most effective one’s are remote and complicated but practicable and accessible. The primary one’s lies in the fact that higher authorities had providing bins in order to reduce the waste products and masses can put there refuses in that and concerned authorities must implement rigorous rules and regulations. Moreover, higher authorities had better organise awareness camps to teach public about negative consequence that stems from waste material and they must know about some principal like 3R that says reduce, recycle and reuse. Only when convergent efforts are taken by all sectors this problem can be overcome.
To conclude, not having enough recycling is the prevalent problem that faced by all nations around the globe. Although, this problem can be overcome if the effective measures are taken by all sectors.
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below illustrates the use of tobacco products by secondary school students in the United States 78
- We have three important parts of education reading writing and math Some people think every child will benefit from a fourth skill added to the list computer skills Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated in the same as as adults who commit crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1007, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e demerits have far reaching impacts on individuals health. Steps to deal with this prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The primary one’s lies in the fact that higher authorities had providing bins in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1553133515 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60343636296 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534059945504 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7867346581 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180888700735 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509142806373 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398981010492 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119577555675 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214989225006 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.