Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecturer are both about whether the girl in the painting is Jane Austen or not.The author of the reading states that although the painting was not entitled as Jane Austen, it is believed that the girl in the painting is Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the claim and attacks each of the reason made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that the painting is recognized by her decendent family as they had given authority to use portrait for illustration after her demmise. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that when the portrait was authorized, Auten was dead almost 70 years ago so the family who are claiming the painting might not have known and seen her in real life.
Secondly, the girl in painting is identical to adult Austen painted by her sister Cassandra which was the only accepted painting of Austen. In addition, the feature like face, nose, eyebrow, shaape of body and so on in the painting exactly matches with adult Austen. The speaker on other hand points out that since Austen had joint family and there were many cousins who were of teen age, the girl in the painting might resemble any one of them instead. Furthermore, there are few instances to prove the painting to be of her niece..
Finally, the reading passage also notes that although the painting was not signed and dated, the style is linked to the society painter that the affluent family like Austen would hire. Moreover, the artist was active duing the period when Austen was a teenage girl. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts foth the idea that the stamp on back of canvas clearly shows the portrait was sketched by another artist. Additionally, he began to sell painting when Austen was 27 years old neither in her teen age. Therefore, this clarifies the the girl in the picture is not Austen.
As we can see, the author and speaker holds conflicting views on the portrait whether it is of Austen or not. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argumnet.
- If you could go back to some time and place in the past when and where would you go why Use specific answer and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 70
- Many students now rely on technology for learning through the use of computers the Internet and other forms of technology What are the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for learning Use specific details and examples to support your answer 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...l in the painting is Jane Austen or not.The author of the reading states that altho...
^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat the girl in the painting is Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the clai...
^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...and there were many cousins who were of teen age, the girl in the painting might resembl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instances to prove the painting to be of her niece.. Finally, the reading passag...
^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o prove the painting to be of her niece.. Finally, the reading passage also note...
^^
Line 4, column 501, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
... Austen was 27 years old neither in her teen age. Therefore, this clarifies the the girl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 537, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...her teen age. Therefore, this clarifies the the girl in the picture is not Austen. As ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 537, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...her teen age. Therefore, this clarifies the the girl in the picture is not Austen. As ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vely challenges the writer’s argumnet.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79943502825 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39676073067 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2992493016 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3888888889 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0599486369668 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222717426967 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313853120894 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0349319396212 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365188281375 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.