Some people think technology development decreases crime, while others believe it actually encourages crimes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion ?
Technological booms have impacted multi-faceted aspects of life in recent years. While there are people believing that new applications of technology would help to reduce criminality, others think otherwise. This essay will elaborate on both sides and explain why intervention of technology would helps restrict crime rather than foster it.
On the one hand, ubiquity of social media spreads criminal acts. It is not uncommon that young people, the main users of social platforms could be contributors to the phenomenon. The young get their unenviable reputation for their frivolity and superstition due to their scarcity of life experience. Their negative patterns of behavior thus can be pale imitations of criminal acts which are rampant on the networking sites. Another downside of technological advancement is that it helps cover the identity of its users. Given the ease of creating new accounts on the internet, cybercriminals can sheathe themselves in the cloak of online anonimity. This makes tracing and unmasking the vilians on internet platforms difficult for the authorities.
On the other hand, utilization of technology acts can deter crimes. One of the most widespread use of technology to prevent lawlessness is application of sercurity camera. The state-of-the-art equipment coupled with other redeeming features such as facial regconition function can support investigators in searching for law-breakers or runaways. Additionally, by designing algorithms that can regconize potential crime scenes, developers can provide the antidote for lowering the chance of people commiting crimes. Finally, with devices in tracking former criminals are already in use, which are useful in informing and warning the convicts to stay away from certain subjects. This not only shield the vulnerable from hostility but stop those once violated the law from recidivism.
In sum, even though the advancement of technology contributes to criminal activites, its benefits definately offset the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-16 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Lyn98@ | 84 | view |
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 738, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this once' or 'those onces'?
Suggestion: this once; those onces
... the vulnerable from hostility but stop those once violated the law from recidivism. In...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, thus, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72333333333 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11144660889 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643333333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9226068186 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138233779454 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405296881701 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581360480468 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844248159155 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769866182953 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.