Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.
Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
To achieve workplace efficiency, it is essential to have proper communication between employers and staffs. In today’s business world, employees are constantly connected to their corporations through various electronic media such as cellphones, computers, internet, etc. It is the preference of some managers or owners to keep their subordinates engaged all the times, even when they are on a break. With the advent of modern communication channels, such as texting and email, it is now possible for those supervisors to check on their workers on a continuous basis. Nevertheless, putting stress on employees during their break time is a malpractice, which hurts not only organizational productivity but also employee well-being at the same time.
Senior management in institutions are likely to be performance oriented. Due to the nature of their position and compensation structure, they strive for maximum output. The privacy of their subordinates sometimes means very little to them. This is why they prefer that their staffs will always be at their disposal, even on the weekends. Being highly result-oriented, these managers engage with their staffs constantly, resulting in a hustle culture. This approach is sometimes advantageous for meeting targets or deadlines, and short-term spike in profit may be attained by it. However, to achieve sustainable workflow, employees must be provided proper breaks between works.
Employees need to have proper time-off between workdays to rejuvenate themselves. If that time is cut short, it will most likely hamper the quality of his or her regular works. Moreover, a worker might get some job done on the holidays if he or she is pressurized by his or her employer, but the performance would most likely be poor. Furthermore, if boundaries between work and personal life does not prevail, the family life will become very chaotic, and no work life balance will exist. Eventually, both the efficiency and quality of the work will reduce and the organization will suffer in the long run.
To conclude, constantly connecting with employees during holidays is likely to be very disruptive. This practice, although beneficial for some organizations, can disrupt the personal lives of the employees. Although this culture may appear productive in the short run, the long-term disadvantages far outweigh the shorter-term benefits.
- Children can learn effectively by watching television Therefore they should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o employee well-being at the same time. Senior management in institutions are li...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48097826087 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10539573829 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584239130435 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3934308415 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.85 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25294995635 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684955112505 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527336794919 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13839754136 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471744952162 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o employee well-being at the same time. Senior management in institutions are li...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48097826087 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10539573829 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584239130435 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3934308415 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.85 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25294995635 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684955112505 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527336794919 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13839754136 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471744952162 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.