The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Percentage of households with electrical appliances (1920-2019)
The given charts show the changes in ownership of electrical equipment and the number of hours taken doing housework in families in a country from 1920 to 2019.
It is clear that the percentage of households with electrical devices increased and the amount of time for doing housework decreased.
In 1920, the percentage of households that own washing machines, vacuum cleaners, and refrigerators is 40%, 30%, and 0%, respectively. These figures rose dramatically to 70%, 70%, and 90% in 1960. On the contrary, there was a sharp drop of 30 hours (from 50 hours per week to 20 hours per week) in the amount of time spent doing housework per week in families.
In the next period from the year 1960 to the year 2019, the proportion of households using electrical appliances continued to grow moderately, especially the figures for vacuum cleaners, and refrigerators reached to 100%. In the same trend as the period from 1920 to 1960, the number of hours doing housework per week went down slightly with a reduction of 10 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80223817252 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0435776782 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231346452269 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114838255909 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995241312456 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17677474075 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924647255876 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.