The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014
The given table provides the information about the manufacture of oil on a daily basis in 4 different nations between 2010 and 2014.
As can be seen from the table, almost all countries witnessed increases in the production of oil, except for that of country C during the 4-year period. Specifically, country C held the highest figure from 2010 to 2013, but it dropped to the second position on the list in 2014.
In 2010, country C took the first place in oil production at 175,000, followed by that of country A, at 105,000. While there was a significant decrease in Country C’s oil quantities of more than 70,000, Country A surpassed other countries and led in oil production at 113,000 at the end of the period shown.
On the other hand, country B registered no data in the first 3 years. However, the oil output in this country suddenly went up to 8,000 before growing more than five-fold to reach 50,000 in 2014. Similarly, although the oil volume of country D rose considerably by 40,000, this was the country generating the lowest oil amount at the end of the period in comparison with other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 80
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64999823187 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6813908747 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385756844381 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178480251168 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634912914277 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246110721935 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513378058631 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.