The bar chart describes the trends in housing, particularly the changes in the percentage of families owning and renting accommodation over the period of 93 years from 1918 to 2011.
The graph representing data in percentage terms offers a breakdown of house rental and ownership dynamics observed from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, the share of households owning accommodation was in an increasing trend until 2001, and we can notice a negative correlation with the percentage change of renting ones. A skew in favour of homes rental ceased to exist in 1971, when the distribution was equal, and reversed from 1981 onwards. Having reached a plateau in 2001, both indicators edged in the opposite direction, breaking the previous pattern.
As we can see from the owned accommodation dataset, it has been gradually rising by approximately 10 percentage points per year, with the exception of 1953, 2001 and 2011. While in 1953 and 2001 the number stayed unchanged, 2011 is the only year when it marginally dropped. Nevertheless, an impressive performance is evident by the steady edge higher from 20% in 1918 to above 60% by the end of the observation period.
The weight of households in rented homes was in a downward trend throughout the term, dropping from almost 80% to slightly below 40%. However, there were not any rapid dips, just gradual steps of up to ten percentage points per annum. The only exception was in 2011 when the number popped up higher by about five ticks.
- Many students start looking for jobs as soon as they graduate Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- The article states pollution is the main reason for the decline in sea otter population whereas the lecture suggests that predation is the major factor 83
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ximately 10 percentage points per year, with the exception of 1953, 2001 and 2011. While in 1953 and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99078341014 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78665084332 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617511520737 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7499565217 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254894337135 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892999952538 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064389781117 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150253211389 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414938534185 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.