Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
it's arguable whether citizens play a role in protecting the environment. However, some opine that governments and business organisations have to take on a huge burden to save our planet. In my opinion, both of them have the responsibility to take part in preserving nature.
Firstly, it is true that authorities should enact laws to save the habitats. Small and large companies prioritize making profits and being wealthier. They care more about money and don't pay attention to the massive impacts on the climate. For example, in industrial cities, there is huge air pollution due to emissions from factories. In addition, some industries dispose of their waste into rivers and the seas. Subsequently, this will have detrimental effects on the climate and harm water creatures. In turn, this will affect the ecosystem on earth. Therefore, governments ought to impose strict fines on the companies in order to reduce their emissions and toxic waste.
Secondly, governments should run campaigns on social media platforms to incentivise people to be green. So, encouraging people to recycle, mitigating the use of plastics, and planting trees in their gardens. this, I believe, is the best way because if authorities enforce individuals to do this, it is like the overly permissive parents endangering their kids. Nevertheless, it is hard to enact laws on the populace, especially in overpopulated areas such as India and America, which believe in human liberty. On top of that, people should be urged to use public transport instead of private cars to decrease their carbon footprint.
In conclusion, it is crucial for governments to outlaw laws that compel business organisations to reduce their emissions and harmful materials. Nonetheless, citizens play a partial role by being green and using public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
its arguable whether citizens play a role i...
^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...althier. They care more about money and dont pay attention to the massive impacts on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s, and planting trees in their gardens. this, I believe, is the best way because if ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98529543123 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8292855784 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.070931810035 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200077278711 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350353604751 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0370064228762 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175146633392 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.