The chart illustrates the proportion of young people in higher education from 2000 to 2010.
It can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward, except for country B. In addition, the highest percentage of young people in higher education was recorded in country D.
Turning to the chart for more details, in 2000, the proportion of young people in higher education in country A accounted for 37% of the total number, which was more lower than country B (40%). There was an enormous growth of the young people in higher education in country A in 2010, at nearly 58%. The figure for country B remained unchanged after fell slightly to 39% in 2005.
Regarding to the other country,in 2000, about 43% and 45% of people in country C and country D attended higher education respectively. In the next 5 years, the figure for country C rose slightly and stayed unchanged at roughly 47%, in contrast, the young people in higher education in country D witnessed a dramatic climb to reach the highest figure at about 60% in 2010.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 56
- Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
... for 37% of the total number, which was more lower than country B 40%. There was an enormo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... 2005. Regarding to the other country,in 2000, about 43% and 45% of people in co...
^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about 43% and 45% of people in country C and country D attended higher education ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54971697168 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1054375747 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358359551267 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209017122518 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147902901779 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290015397339 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129990545768 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.