The given line charts illustrate the consumption patterns of different food groups in the UK over a span of six decades, from 1942 to 2005. The data presented pertains to milk (in various categories), fresh fruit, and vegetables.
Overall, there were notable shifts in food consumption trends during the period under consideration. While the consumption of milk, except for skimmed milk, experienced a decline, the consumption of fresh fruit and fruit juice showed a steady increase. Additionally, the consumption of fresh vegetables initially declined but later exhibited a recovery.
In terms of milk consumption, the most prominent category was total milk and cream, which consistently had the highest consumption levels throughout the entire period. Despite a marginal decrease from approximately 2.2 liters per week in 1942 to 2 liters per week in 2005, it remained the most consumed type of milk. Skimmed milk, on the other hand, saw a dramatic rise in popularity, starting from just over 0 liters in 1975 and reaching more than 1 liter per week by the mid-1990s.
Regarding fresh fruit consumption, there was a steady upward trend over time. Starting at around 200 grams per week in the 1940s, it steadily increased, surpassing the consumption of fresh vegetables around the turn of the century. By 2005, fresh fruit consumption reached approximately 400 grams per week, indicating a significant rise in preference for this food group.
In contrast, the consumption of fresh vegetables initially experienced a decline, dropping from about 900 grams per week in the 1940s to a low point of approximately 700 grams per week in the 1990s. However, there was a recovery in the early 2000s, with consumption levels surpassing the 800-gram mark by 2005.
In conclusion, the line charts depict the changing consumption patterns of milk, fresh fruit, and vegetables in the UK from 1942 to 2005. The data reveals a decline in milk consumption overall, except for the increasing popularity of skimmed milk. Fresh fruit consumption exhibited a consistent upward trend, while fresh vegetables experienced a temporary decline before showing signs of recovery.
- The charts below show information about the top five supermarkets in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 47
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, while, as to, except for, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 965.302439024 189% => OK
No of words: 342.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33625730994 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99834803986 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8712620357 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11677824692 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051032886885 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468346486888 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810724272784 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510836671905 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, while, as to, except for, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 965.302439024 189% => OK
No of words: 342.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33625730994 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99834803986 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8712620357 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11677824692 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051032886885 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468346486888 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810724272784 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510836671905 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.