The line graph shows the number of players in four different sports badminton tennis basketball rugby in a particular European country between 1985 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where

The line graph gives information about how many people played different kinds of sports in a particular region from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, as can be seen, people who attended basketball and tennis don't change too much. However, the number of people taking part in tennis saw an upward trend while rugby's players experienced a downward trend.

At the beginning of the period, people played basketball and badminton approximately from 50 to nearly 80. By contrast, people's choices at rugby and badminton better than others sports. With roughly 250, rugby became the most popular sports that people play in 1985. During the same period, people who played tennis also gained 150 people.

In 1995, there had a little bit change. Looking at participacion numbers, people who choose basketball and badminton had remain fairly stable while tennis and badminton had fluctuation. In this period, rugby's players had a dramatical decrease, with the figure 200 people, while tennis's players had a steady increase at the same time. Finally, over the following 10 years, the number of people attending rugby just was only 50 people and went down a lot. However, people who took part in tennis rose significantly with the over 200 people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ople who attended basketball and tennis dont change too much. However, the number of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ned 150 people. In 1995, there had a little bit change. Looking at participacion number...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...who choose basketball and badminton had remain fairly stable while tennis and badminto...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...who choose basketball and badminton had remain fairly stable while tennis and badminto...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49963240782 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.275989193 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183112409778 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731206692937 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561461083203 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13554515243 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056798311643 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ople who attended basketball and tennis dont change too much. However, the number of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ned 150 people. In 1995, there had a little bit change. Looking at participacion number...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...who choose basketball and badminton had remain fairly stable while tennis and badminto...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...who choose basketball and badminton had remain fairly stable while tennis and badminto...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49963240782 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.275989193 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183112409778 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731206692937 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561461083203 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13554515243 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056798311643 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.