Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in the global market, this is necessary to attract the best management talent. What are your views?
It has been far more normal that large organizations offer much more favorable compensation packages for top executives than subordinate staff with respect to hiring and retaining the best decent management teams for their companies. From my perspective, it is definitely justifiable and this essay would elaborate on this topic.
To commence with, managers of large corporations deserve to receive higher remuneration than junior staff because of numerous reasons. Firstly, it is the directors, not anyone else, that run the organizations, carefully take consideration among imperative business plans, and are responsible for any failure resulting from their orientation. Secondly, they are always on the lookout for innovative ideas and implement those ideas so that contribute to the wealth and long-term development of organizations. In addition, it is crystal clear that the skills and knowledge required to be able to occupy such management positions are earned with several years of experience and management degrees, both of which are the results of constant perseverance and involve both time and money. Due to the significant roles that senior managers play in companies, and heavy workload they endure, and the effort as well as the money they spend to obtain the highest positions in companies, being paid better salaries is one of the roots of motivation for them.
In the meanwhile, offering attractive incentives is an effective strategy that most companies would utilize to captivate talent managers. To be more specific, the number of senior managers who could meet all requirements about knowledge and skills of management positions is small while the demand of organization is increasing. Also, they are likely to compare the benefits of other companies before taking the decision of choosing and contributing to which organization. Once giving talents so impressive salaries that can satisfy them to live a financially comfortable life, they are likely to enroll and then work for these organizations. As a result, this way helps companies to take advantage compared with their competitors. Aside from that, this policy also results in an improvement in the workforce because other low-level executives would take their attempt to work, broaden their knowledge and gain more achievement for companies so that they can promote to higher positions with more favorable incomes.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the method of attracting skillful people by giving bigger salaries to directors is a successful management strategy. Not only does it stimulate the employees to work most efficiently, but also finds talented individuals who deserve their financial status
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 89
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in the global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 73
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 84
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- IS PROTECTIONISM GOOD OR BAD 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01101562282 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0022221811 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163094622239 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575754163762 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425270394066 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107504985315 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238068146901 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01101562282 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0022221811 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163094622239 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575754163762 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425270394066 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107504985315 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238068146901 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.