The given chart demonstrates how much money three countries allocated to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006.
It is obvious that, all of three mentioned countries had a increase in their funding and the total money spending for developing countries from 2006 to 2010. In the year 2010, The US outstripped in the funding for a number of developing countries.
In the period of 4 year, starting from 2006, there was always a steady growth in the USA government’s funds until 2010 of more than 10% in the money which developing countries were received from the USA. and the massive percentage witnessed is in the last year in the mentioned period, occupied 20,3% total of funding in the mentioned countries, followed by EU and the other countries which has funds to help a coupled of countries, with numbers which was not higher than the USA, at just approximately 3% in 2006 and about 4% in the year 2010.
A 4-year mentioned period witnessed a upward trend in the money of the government in three area: USA, EU and the other countries allocating for some developing countries, just over 15% in 2006, but there was a noticeable change in this funding in 4 years later, with 28.1%
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive 84
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- Some people think it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature such as novels and poems To what extend do you agree and disagree 95
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in thier everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... countries allocated to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t, all of three mentioned countries had a increase in their funding and the total...
^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...g countries were received from the USA. and the massive percentage witnessed is in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... A 4-year mentioned period witnessed a upward trend in the money of the govern...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77990430622 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70215919945 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.375640554 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8333333333 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309204897421 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195555847668 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624777712956 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227321711134 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487201411346 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.