A glance at the provided line graph illustrates the information about the figures of three different crimes in Manchester city from 2003 to 2012. In general, it is clearly apparent that burglary had extreme downward pattern while car theft and robbery showed slightly upward and stable trend respectively.
Looking in more detail from the chart, at the beginning of the period, burglary was the highest illegal act happened in the city at near 3,500 cases while car theft only recorded at around 2,300 cases and robbery was much lower at only one seventh of the burglary. In 2004, all the crimes number increased by 100 to 300 cases. However, the figures of burglary started to drop dramatically at around 1,000 cases in 2008 made it as the second highest crime after car theft. In the next four years until the period ended, the incidence of burglary reported to increase by 500 cases. Oppositely, car theft cases have documented to have an upward trend although it had fluctuation from 2004 to 2008. In 2012, car theft was the highest crime which have approximately 2,800 incidents. Finally, robbery was the lowest violation among others which only observed not more than 1,000 cases during the periods.
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 78
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city 84
- Cheating in exams is one of the biggest problems in education What do you think about reasons for this Give some solution to solve the problem 56
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95566502463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46369449805 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8663921509 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158397502865 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722295181559 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102847803164 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171640611713 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949901251598 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95566502463 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46369449805 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8663921509 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158397502865 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722295181559 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102847803164 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171640611713 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949901251598 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.