Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies, rather than real-life experiences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The learning approach of youngsters is a major topic of concern these days. While some people believe that teenagers often learn by reading books or watching movies instead of practical experiences, I completely disagree with this point of view.
The first justification for my disagreement is that most of the zoomers' generation tend to have unique and bold perception compared to previous generations. For instance, they are likely considered as healthy young people who love to explore and learn new things. In fact, this might be depended on the person’s personality. In other words, while a number of youngsters would prefer to join in collective activities for learning, the others have a desire of emerging themselves in their favorite books or movies to gain knowledge. Nevertheless, with the continuous advancement of society, the demand of acumen and flexibility are more essential for young people’s career, besides their academic performance. Therefore, many researchers have indicated that teenagers are showing positive signs in participating in more practical experiences than before, with the aim of accumulating skills, widening the circle of relationships as well as impressing employers.
Another reason for my belief is that through modern living conditions, there are more practical trips and programs organized by schools and professional organizations these days. Indeed, as observed in recent years by both experts and parents, most schools organize a field trip for their students at least once during the school year. For example, these could be a visit to a museum, a zoo or even a picnic with team building games. Similarly, some private education organizations also launch short-term summer camp study abroad trips with many gainful incentives and activities to attract affluent parents to register their children to enroll. Thus, it can be seen that access to real-life experiences in modern times is not a difficult prospect because some schools have considered it as a compulsory condition in terms of learning.
To conclude, I completely disagree that teenagers almost learn by reading books or watching movies instead of practical experiences due to two main aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | thuthao2000 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | thuthao2000 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | unknownabc | 87 | view |
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 73
- With the advancements of technology crime rates tend to increase What are the causes What can be done to decrease the crime rate in this digitalization age 84
- Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies rather than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Young people today mostly learn by reading books or watching movies rather than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50728862974 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03399804138 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.270880019 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188010197115 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619612264039 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07143980445 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144674225982 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744969622006 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50728862974 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03399804138 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.270880019 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188010197115 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619612264039 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07143980445 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144674225982 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744969622006 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.