In the era of global innovation, people who live in cities have a tendency to choose either a horizontal or vertical city. However, a recent opinion has risen that a vertical city is the best condition to live in compared to that of a horizontal city. In this essay, I will illuminate both sides of the debate before coming to a conclusion.
Some people argue that living in a vertical house can bring good conditions to residents because of the convenience of this type of house. To explain, vertical houses include multi-storeys that are equipped with sufficient amenities such as supermarkets, fitness and yoga, living pools, playgrounds, schools. Therefore, residents can easily get access to these services with a short distance and time instead of looking for similar services in a place having a long distance. There could be no double that if citizens reside in a block building, they will receive convenience conditions by services of the vertical houses. Moreover, some people believe that the security of a vertical house will be safer than a horizontal house. In more detail, there are some activities that apartment buildings apply to ensure the safety of citizens such as distributing guards, setting passwords or identifying cards before entering the building. For example, if a stranger visits a building, they have to go through a security check of the building. As a result, dwellers feel more comfortable and guarded due to the high safety of a vertical city.
On the other hand, other people believe that a horizontal city can help dwellers mitigate risks related to fire issues. To be more specific, these houses are designed to be streamline with a few storeys so that residents are more likely to escape outside in the fire. Moreover, horizontal houses provide private spaces to family members. Instead of using shared areas like apartment buildings, horizontal cities tend to divide into many specific rooms. Besides, the houses can offer more spaces for a garden, playground and parking. Furthermore, it seems that the larger space of the house can be more suitable to multigenerational households while a vertical city can only apply for a small family due to limited space.
In conclusion, I think that living in a vertical or horizontal city will bring specific advantages so that we should take them into thorough consideration to optimize the best living conditions . While a vertical city brings convenience with sufficient amenities and a high security system, a horizontal city can ensure safety in the fire and provide private spaces and is also suitable for larger families.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both view and give your opinion
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n to optimize the best living conditions . While a vertical city brings convenienc...
^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is also suitable for larger families.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10747663551 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84914477761 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481308411215 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6230944844 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.052631579 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73684210526 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291974761981 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929378469095 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886038690729 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206431662672 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854529180065 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.