It is true that robotic technology has become increasingly widespread in today’s modern life and has always been a topic of interest. While many individuals argue that robots have adverse implications for human society, I believe that they will prove instrumental to our lives in the future.
On the one hand, proponents argue that over-reliance on advanced machinery can result in great damage to both individuals and society. The most obvious threat of this is the significant increase in the unemployment rate. Some major enterprises are gradually substituting automation for the human workforce to cut down operating costs in light of their ability to work relentlessly, causing the loss of jobs to unskilled workers. Another compelling point is that the assistance of machines to perform various manual works inadvertently makes people more sedentary. In fact, automatic gadgets have become an indispensable part of most families such as robotic vacuum, which means people are increasingly relying on these machines, which is a major contributor to health problems like obesity.
On the other hand, I would advocate that robotic engineering brings countless benefits to society in multiple aspects of life. First, robots are key in driving economic productivity. Automated machines and processes can support people working in harsh conditions, especially in a toxic environment, contributing to ensuring speed and precision in manufacturing, which foster production both in terms of quality and quantity. Second, the development of robotic technology can create breakthroughs in medical treatment. Current medical applications of robots like robot-assisted surgeries allow humans to treat complicated cases with higher success rates, which helps further human longevity.
In conclusion, I believe that the upside of robots is far more significant than their downside. All technologies carry a certain degree of risk, however, if we always oppose new inventions, society will never prosper.
- People should look after their health as a duty for a society rather than for personal benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Cambridge 15 Test 1 Writing task 1 The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in give Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12545818863 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653333333333 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5108346449 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165839173314 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502069458528 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324350351509 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923093020233 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373441518655 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.