The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the proportion of the citizens living in urban areas in Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand between 1970 and 2020, with anticipation for 2030 and 2040.
Overall, the share of 4 Asian countries' residents living in cities had a significant rise all the period, while Malaysia expected to hit a peak in 2040. On the other hand, the percentage of population living in cities in Thailand was predicted to arrived at the lowest point.
During the period 1970 to 1990, the share of Philippine' citizens marginally grew, from 30% to around 50%. Similarly, the percentage of Thailand' residents living in cities climbed negligibly from nearly 20% to around 30%. Then, it can be witnessed a fluctuation of these two countries in 10 years later.
The proportion of population living in urban residency in Malaysia and Indonesia started at precisely 30% and roughly 15%, after which these saw moderate increased in 1990, followed by a remarkable upward till 2020. These 4 Asian countries' percentage were predicted to soared rapidly in 2030 and 2040. Moreover, the share of citizens living in urban areas in Malaysia expected to reached a highest point at 80% while these 3 countries anticipated to shy of Malaysia's proportion about 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... population living in cities in Thailand was predicted to arrived at the lowest p...
^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...arkable upward till 2020. These 4 Asian countries percentage were predicted to soared rap...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...n areas in Malaysia expected to reached a highest point at 80% while these 3 coun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13658536585 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8281158292 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2174444651 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245600453703 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112507425165 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645981759559 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161340519876 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370720140756 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.