The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart indicates vehicle priority of youngsters consisting of automobiles, motorcycles and bicycles in distinctive regions around the world.
Overall, cars are the most prevalent vehicle for the young generation in four countries, as opposed to motorcycles which are less selected by young people than others excluding the USA. It is noticeable that in Germany, the young generation in Germany are more interested in bicycles than other vehicles.
Regarding the rate of youngsters using cars in Great Britain is identical to the USA, with the figure being at 60%. By contrast, the proportion of counterparts selecting cars as their main vehicle in Germany and France makes up for 40% and approximately 75% respectively. In addition, there are 10% of young people in Great Britain who choose motorcycles as their main transport, compared to 30% of young people consider motorcycles as their preferred transport which is triple the rate of people using cars in Great Britain. On the other hand, the disparity of youngsters who select motorcycles as their main vehicle between Germany and France is insignificant, with the figure being at approximately 15% and 10% respectively.
By contrast, the proportion of the young generation in Great Britain choosing bicycles as their most-liked transport accounted for 30% which is triple the percentage of young people using bicycles to move consistently. Additionally, around 45% of youngsters in Germany choose bicycles as their main vehicle which is the largest contributor in four countries and almost triple the percentage of young citizens showing interest in bicycles in France, with the figure being at around 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-22 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess selected by young people than others excluding the USA. It is noticeable that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42965779468 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00739545403 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429657794677 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4716750586 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.666666667 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151710455414 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688580104159 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515889091936 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849651988675 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518427052456 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess selected by young people than others excluding the USA. It is noticeable that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42965779468 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00739545403 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429657794677 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4716750586 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.666666667 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151710455414 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688580104159 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515889091936 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849651988675 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518427052456 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.