The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table and charts illustrate the budget revenue and expenditure in one area of Britain between two years 2017 and 2018.
By and large, the money mainly came from national government sources while spent for officers and staff’s salaries most. Having less difference when comparing total revenue source of the two years.
The second year of the report witnessed a slight raise of budget sources from the national government and others, while the money collected from local taxes increased 11 million euro. Specifically, the money from the national government lifted to 2 million euro, that was four times more than that of other sources such as grants.
17% is the budget of the British government spending for building and transport in both 2017 and 2018. The salaries for officers and staff, which accounted for three-quarters of expenditure in 2017, had a downward trend in 2018 (69% left). It is opposite for technology, the money that was spent for this field significantly flew from 8 to 14% from 2017 to 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woollen goods Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 89
- Task 2 Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Task 2 In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Task 1 The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that of other sources such as grants. 17% is the budget of the British governm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00584795322 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60549778743 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2016159656 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259571607716 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116036360908 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765516175428 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161147054538 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076011380776 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.