According to the reading passage, it is stated that since the determination of Agnostids' living conditions and behavior through the fossil remains is not possible, paleontologists have proposed different theories about it. The article presents several theories in this regard. However, the lecturer challenges the assumptions made by the author, and refutes them by presenting three key reasons.
Firstly, the reading contends that just like the primitive arthropods, Agnostids were strong swimmers and preyed on smaller animals. The professor, however, raises skepticism about this assertion by explaining that while animals that are swimming predators have large developed eyes and a good vision, Agnostids have tiny poorly developed eyes or are mostly blind. She emphasizes that Agnostids may have a special sensory organ to catch their prey.
Secondly, the article asserts that Agnostids were living on the seafloor and they survived by scavenging and grazing on bacteria. On the contrary, the lecturer counters this idea by pointing out that seafloor dwellers lack the ability to go around swiftly, and they mostly occupy a small geographic area. According to her, because Agnostids were inhabited in multiple and distant geographic areas, they are not likely to be seafloor settlers.
Finally, the reading posits that another theory for Agnostids is that they were parasites that were living on and feeding of larger organisms. The professor disputes this claim by elaborating that parasite populations cannot be very large, and if they do not be within a certain limit, they will kill off their host. She states that unlike what is mentioned in the passage, Agnostids rule out of this theory as vast amounts of their fossils have been discovered in a single area.
- TPO56 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
- TPO 46Question Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to old 83
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- n the United States medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms However there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in elec 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them by presenting three key reasons. Firstly, the reading contends that just ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial sensory organ to catch their prey. Secondly, the article asserts that Agnos...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re not likely to be seafloor settlers. Finally, the reading posits that another...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38129496403 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68222820033 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9495204834 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231464504667 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859164978466 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548956780293 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135804289392 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025198897652 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.