Describe the chart
The proportion of employee training offered by four organizations is shown in the diagram. The training personnel of firm A barely increased between 2003 and 2006, but the other companies' employees grew steadily.
Between 2003 and 2004, the share of firm A remained constant at 27 percent. The percentage of this organization began to decline significantly in the years 2004 to 2005, then marginally increased to reach 28 percent in 2006. Company B significantly increased the amount of staff training it offered, from 28 percent in 2003 to 31 percent in 2004. The percentage for this organization decreased somewhat between 2004 and 2005, from 31 percent to 30 percent. Similar to business A, for the year between 2005 and 2006, the percentage of company B peaked at 34 percent. The percentages of firms C and D were in direct opposition to one another from 2003 and 2005. According to the figure, firm D hit a low of 17 percent between 2003 and 2004, whereas company C saw a significant increase from 25 to 36 percent. The ratio of employee training from business C drastically decreased from 36 percent to 31 percent between 2004 and 2005. On the other hand, Company D increased their percentage from 17 to 34 percent. The numbers for both businesses grew between 2005 and 2006. In addition, to firm C's growth of 36 percent, the other one peaked at 35 percent.
Overall, the graph shows how four businesses, A, B, C, and D, increased their staff training percentages between 2003 and 2006.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87109375 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85666014817 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44140625 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0404904496 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0714285714 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.