Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, the Internet makes it possible for people to learn about diverse countries’ cultures without having footprints in there. While I accept that people can understand about the world by using Internet as a way of exploring, I still believe that real-world experiences can not be replaced by it.
On the one hand, there are several video-sharing platforms available such as Youtube or Facebook thanks to the Internet, enabling people upload endless clips with diverse interesting contents that include about cultures and travels. In addition, these platforms allow people discuss and comment about their own experiences freely. Such an convenient and amazing way for people to learn about the world. Moreover, exploring the world through screens can help people stay up-to-date with current events or any changes in other countries. It is considered as a way of saving money and benefiting individuals who do not have enough financial stability and time to travel abroad.
On the other hand, reading information or watching video about another country can solely give people limited amount of knowledge. Traveling to foreign countries and having numerous real-world experiences, individuals can gain deeper insight and have chances to immerse themselves in the local lives. For example, seeing a festival through screens and taking part in it actually are significantly different. The former tend to give you only about how it happen but the later can give you the feeling and atmosphere, which can create memorable time in life. Furthermore, it may hard to convey accurately or entirely about another place by words. In fact, readers or audiences can not experience the smell of atmosphere or amazing flavor of food via the Internet.
In conclusion, while Internet offers people endless information about another country and is considered significantly convenient for online travels, I believe that hand-on experiences is impossible to be replaced due to several things it brings to people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm
- The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...bout their own experiences freely. Such an convenient and amazing way for people t...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
...rmer tend to give you only about how it happen but the later can give you the feeling ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38853503185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82877134825 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8202892855 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16227991612 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547286161625 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301068268251 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099882872364 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184126831363 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.