internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, many people depend on the internet and technology, so they decide not to travel to other places to sympathise how others live. Although technology can provide several information and analysis, from my point of view, it is necessary to be personally experienced.
Admittedly, in terms of discovering and learning about a new aspect, especially a new place, smart devices can assist people by providing people with numerous useful data. In some circumstances, surfing data on social media or internet is more effective and convenient for travellers, compared to visiting directly to the new country itself. For instance, majority of people are used to experiencing the lives of foreign people without any effort to learn new things. However, they spend most time on residing in their hotel or hostile, playing games or reading books, which seem to be very common to them, instead of getting down to spectate other’s daily lives.
Firstly, in spite of the fact that online tourism has been more famous in popularity, there are a number of tourists prefer to experience personally the culture and tradition of those on foreign countries. Travelling to the new location and meeting foreigners face-to-face, tourists realise that some traditional values cannot be separated by technology, such as food, shopping and music. Therefore, there are most of popularity, including the richest group of people, would rather go on vacation than stay at home using the internet to explore a new area. Secondly, according to some science research, the information and knowledge that we get from internet are unstable and can be erased fluently, on the other hand, to build up our new unforgettable memory, visiting to new destination is required.
Although the internet provides helpful analysis about other countries, it is not a substitute for personal experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both view and give your opinion 92
- some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the process of growing and preparing pineapples and pineapple products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some information'.
Suggestion: some information
...s live. Although technology can provide several information and analysis, from my point of view, it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30743243243 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90835605984 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5836525837 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161031538578 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648006479078 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578693106264 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105880516234 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470504694374 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some information'.
Suggestion: some information
...s live. Although technology can provide several information and analysis, from my point of view, it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30743243243 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90835605984 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5836525837 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161031538578 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648006479078 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578693106264 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105880516234 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470504694374 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.