The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people. Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, how to achieve wealth and sustainable growth of a nation has been always a top-tier concern of the government. In this context, there is an assertion that the most significant element affecting national development that needs investing more is the young generation and I agree with this because it is children who are the main workforce in the future.
To commence with, more budget should be allocated for children's education as their knowledge is the key answer to the prospective of a nation both economically and socially. Indeed, if teenagers can access comprehensive education, they not only can utilize their knowledge to contribute to the improvement of the economy, science, medicine, and other fields but also stay away from criminal activities or extremist ideologies. In fact, in developed countries, such as Germany, Holland, Finland, and so on, the authorities facilitate a free educational system so that everyone, irrespective of financial background, can have opportunities to go to school. This policy results in a wealthy society with pioneer scientific achievements and a harmonious life without serious criminals. In contrast, if the education of the young population is neglected, children cannot fully develop their intellectual abilities and expand their understanding, leading to the fact that society may miss out on many talented people who could make society better.
Moreover, by allocating more funds to the health care system for the young population, governments can ensure a qualified and healthy workforce for the future. In case children suffer from lots of diseases, the mind is not clear enough to absorb knowledge, and study time may be taken over by the time going to hospital. Consequently, apart from a bad academic performance which is likely to happen, their working efficiency in the future is negatively impacted. Therefore, the government must spend a lot of money on the healthcare system as well as enhance parents’ awareness about this problem so that they can properly rear their offspring. To illustrate, in Nordic countries, healthcare facilities, especially for children, are controlled by authorities and free, which results in an exceptionally high human development index in such nations.
In conclusion, to establish a prosperous society, it is the young generation that is a valuable investment each country should spend money on. Specifically, I assume that education and healthcare are two main problems that should be addressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- Space exploration is a controversial topic Some people believe that resources should be invested in exploring space while others argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing problems on Earth such as poverty and climate change Discuss both 78
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42346938776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11624032598 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6367208213 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.857142857 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134944782841 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443135177365 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564298044188 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797467396461 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204307123584 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42346938776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11624032598 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6367208213 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.857142857 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134944782841 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443135177365 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564298044188 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797467396461 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204307123584 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.