Many young people, in recent years, tend to change their occupations more frequently. While this trend stems from a myriad of factors, I contend that the accompanying advantages will overshadow the disadvantages.
There are two primary reasons why the rate of job-hopping has been on the increase among the young generation. First, since many university graduates lack career orientation, they try out jobs to discover what they would enjoy pursuing professionally. If they are dissatisfied with a given position, young people will find another job that better suits them. Second, lower job satisfaction is another factor that leads youngsters to change work frequently. Young employees, in fact, prioritize job satisfaction and work-life balance over job security and stability, which means They are more likely to switch jobs if they feel current positions do not align with their values, interests, or career goals.
However, I believe that job-hopping may bring more benefits than drawbacks. One obvious benefit is that switching jobs allows young people to have a diverse professional background. Indeed, as different jobs utilize different knowledge bases, they often find it advantageous to acquire a wide-ranging variety of professional skills, facilitating better preparations for new jobs. Furthermore, by working in different jobs, young people can expand their knowledge and expertise, being more adaptable and flexible. In other words, changing jobs helps them become quick learners and risk-takers, who can easily thrive in the competitiveness of the labor market.
In conclusion, young people shift jobs for various reasons, either to identify their passions and career paths or to seek a sense of satisfaction. I still argue that the benefits of it will surpass the pitfalls.
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years pie comparison
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55839416058 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0159348234 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8510993489 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374795190128 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111643536706 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578636517458 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207724641818 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329430421225 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.