Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Science has served the humanity very well so far and have proved its worth for the betterment of the society. Science has solved many problems that humanity has been facing since advent of humankind. Apart from helping the humanity to thrive it has helped to unravel many mysteries of the cosmic world which have always been intriguing to men. Science has helped us to understand our own body in a great deal. Various scientific discoveries from radioactive material to various drugs that have been developed have helped humans to understand the world better. Despite all these novel discoveries science has given tools that if not used in desired way would prove lethal for the humanity. These lethal tools are atomic weapons and various other weapons that have been developed by countries such as weapons of mass destructions.
So I would like to state that Government should allow scientific research that is conducive or for the betterment of the society and humanity at large and should regulate discoveries that can harm the societies or disrupt the way people live as these discoveries prove to be detrimental for the livelihoods of many people. To support my point of view I would like to give two reasons.
Firstly, Scientific discoveries have served the humanity and enriched the experience about life but there have been many discoveries by scientific community which if not used prudently may prove detrimental for the humanity. For instance, during second world war Japan was bombarded with Nuclear weapon by the USA. This bombing killed many people in those two cities and paralyzed thousands of people. Many Generation has gone through the ordeal. The Discovery of nuclear fission or fusion is remarkable milestone in the history of mankind but such discoveries have the potential to wipe out the humanity from the planet. So such discoveries that have the potential to wipe out the humanity or prove detrimental to the humanity should be regulated by the the Government.
Secondly, We as humans have covered a long journey and during thisjourney have made many scitific discoveries that have helped humanity to survive. There was a time in history when a simple fever may have taken toll on the life of a person but due to scientific discoveries and developments in medical sciences have made it possible to save people from deadliest diseases. So these discoveries proved sanguine for the humanity but there are various discoveries that have the magnitude to wipe out people from this planet if such discoveries be allowed to be used freely and be given to irresponsible hand may prove deadly for the people. So, These kind of scientific developments be regulated and be used responsibly for the welfare of the masses.
With this, I would like to conclude that Governements should put necessary conditions on scientific discoveries that have the potential to harm the humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic discoveries from radioactive material to various drugs that have been develope...
^^
Line 1, column 586, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'discoveries'' or 'discovery's'?
Suggestion: discoveries'; discovery's
...e world better. Despite all these novel discoveries science has given tools that if not use...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese lethal tools are atomic weapons and various other weapons that have been dev...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...scoveries by scientific community which if not used prudently may prove detrimenta...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many generations'.
Suggestion: Many generations
...ties and paralyzed thousands of people. Many Generation has gone through the ordeal. The Discov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... to the humanity should be regulated by the the Government. Secondly, We as humans h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... to the humanity should be regulated by the the Government. Secondly, We as humans h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the deadliest'.
Suggestion: from the deadliest
...es have made it possible to save people from deadliest diseases. So these discoveries proved s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...nd may prove deadly for the people. So, These kind of scientific developments be regulated...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09014675052 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74997118234 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429769392034 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0212105081 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939122666577 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343644997829 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491740859265 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821790213277 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464534974186 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.