In most countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more available. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Recent decades have witnessed the proliferation of fast-food because of the reduce in price and widely accessible. In this essay, I will discuss about the benefits and drawbacks of the situation and why I believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, the widespread and cheap in price of the available food can bring various advantages. One of the discernible benefits is the sufficient contribution of food for busy employees. Indeed, with the fast-paced of life, residents need to work longer and more concentration on their workloads therefore they can have limited time to prepare their own dishes. As a result, people who frequently skip daily meals can cause several negative effects for their stomachs. Another benefit is that farmers can earn permanent income. Undoubtedly, the fast-food restaurants need a daily distribution with vegetable, meats from surrounding farmers.
On the other hand, the increasingly fast-food restaurants can cause several disadvantages. Firstly, residents who addict to fast-food can have some health conditions, such as: obesity, high blood pressure. When citizens consume too much available food in their daily basic without doing exercise, this habit can affect their physical conditions and add numerous weights. This will prevent them from doing exercise or even walking as a daily activity. Secondly, the less expensive food can make people easily waste. Indeed, if individuals can spend a minimal money to receive fast-food, they find no reason to conserve it. Consequently, the waste food can be toss into the environment and make the pollution worser.
In conclusion, although the widespread and inexpensiveness of fast-food can help people fulfill their stomachs and farmers can earn sufficient money, I believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages because fast-food can negative effects health conditions of residents and make the pollution worser.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-16 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government should limit the freed 77
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 89
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e proliferation of fast-food because of the reduce in price and widely accessible. In this...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'minimal money'.
Suggestion: minimal money
...waste. Indeed, if individuals can spend a minimal money to receive fast-food, they find no reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57627118644 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00115078953 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3666932985 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200299514538 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693693327001 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393241495 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138190829733 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279264981332 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.