The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Many would assert that restrictions on consumer can solve the environmental problems. In some senses, it is undeniable that impolitical comsumption of customers sometimes worsen environmental issues such as the waste problem. Only by focusing on the merits of regulations on consumers does the speaker overlook the limitation of the policies from the perspectives of promoting illegal practices and the effectiveness of regulations on companies.
Admittedly, few would disagree that household restrictions can improve environmental problems. When it comes to enhancing consumers’ awareness of environmental problem, it seems less coperational regulations than those of general people in daily life that helps the environmental problems. Recycling policies, which encourage people not only to decrease their daily waste, but also to use recycling products, make the public understand the severerity of the waste problem, thereby contributed to decreasing total waste amountsresolve issues of the environment. The point here is that enviornmental policies on the public are basically beneficial for the environmental condition.
Nevertheless, customer regulations can be dissected by the lens of promoting illegal practices. Rether than solving intended problems on the environment, trash policies imposing an extra tax on garbage amounts made people to throw away their trash ilegally in order to avoid the tax. This brought about the increase of waste amounts, and unwittingly worsened the trash problem. This implies that too much emphasis on the customer regulation needs to be reconsidered.
Moreover, restriction on customers is not the only way to solve the problems. Considering the impact on environments, companies which create a myriad of waste including baneful pollutants make more problems on the environment. In fact, most of striking environmental issues are mainly caused by companies, like waste water issues on Korea hurting countless victim. This indicates that regulation on companies regarding envionmental issues should be considered to solve the problems.
To sum up, despite the beneficial outcomes of customer restrictions, promoting people’s illegal actions and companies gigantic impacts on the environment illuminate for us that regulation to the public does not always leads to the enhanced enviornment. Only if we were to ignore the downsides and limitations of regulating citizens, could we conclude that policy concentrating on the public invariably solve environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 70
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 83
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...egulation to the public does not always leads to the enhanced enviornment. Only if we...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87704918033 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.300656143 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0214904266 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.529411765 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230685249435 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750646594031 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410431014556 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129853966496 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343750447048 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.