In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
For better organizations, should leadership be changed in five years? The statement questions whether professions in power have to be kept or resigned periodically. Maintaining leadership seems to have beneficial effects on organizations’ stability. However, I believe that periodical changes of power would make the organization better since these changes can give changes to reevaluate and reform themselves.
Maintaining leadership is certainly one of the ways to keep an organization stable. Although changes in leaders’ views might sometimes occur, core perspectives of leadership on the organization would be maintained. Likewise, other related stakeholders might keep their view on the organization. In this environment, few would think the organizations will face severe transformation. Furthermore, this makes their employees sustainable. Since many workers feel worried, and even fear, when the leadership is supplanted, same management during the long period can foster employees’ thought that their organization is stable to work.
Nevertheless, a true promoter of organizations’ improvement would be periodical replacement of leadership. The important first task of new leadership is to investigate previous management. In this task, new leaders can find not only useful experiences but also some abuse of previous leaders. For example, many democratic nations revise faults of previous governments after a regime change.
Additionally, these fresh leadership can infuse new energy into old organizations. As a new starter, they create a new vision for the organization’s future and sometimes modify an organizational structure to achieve their goal. Even though organizational shifts can some noises in groups, nevertheless it is a needed growth pain and the shift can make the new era of a organization.
In conclusion, I believe changing leadership has more beneficial effects than maintaining. Given that our society is in a rapidly changing world, periodically revising groups’ faults and energy from new leadership might be crucial to enhance the probability of organizations’ success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n and the shift can make the new era of a organization. In conclusion, I belie...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94788273616 5.05705443957 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5413952824 2.79657885939 127% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7315378024 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.049032052596 0.243740707755 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191067250552 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424705090339 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0297494289018 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431433940078 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.1639044944 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.