Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

Whether cellphones should be banned in public places has always been in the center of discussion. Some people welcome cellphones, arguing cellphones are quite an aid for them while others concern the rings and buzzes of phones leave those public places unbearable. From my perspective, cellphones should be allowed in public sites.

Firstly, mobile phones has become part of people’s life which are too integrated to decouple from people even in public places. Mobile phones nowadays functions quite crucially in every aspect of people’s lives. They work as a connection between people and their jobs, friends and families. If people are denied the freedom to use their phones in such public places as museums, libraries or the like, they might miss some important information. Information is important. Examples abound. A businessman have to be in tune with changes of market always. Missing out a piece of information might cost him to lose a chance to promote a deal which ends up quite a fortune. Therefore, it is not feasible to require people to divorce from their phones even in public places.

Secondly, mobile phones could be set to be mute in order to keep quietness of those public places. It is understandable that some people have the concerns that a phone disrupts the great atmosphere of a public place. For example, the sudden rings or buzzes of a phone ruin a mood to appreciate a film in a theatre or the attentions to crack a math problem in a library. However, a cure to what afflict those people is not to ban cellphone. Instead, concerns can be easily solved by public places setting strict rules. Rules include every electronic devices should be muted or a talk on the phone should be conduct in some certain region of a public place. When a cellphone is muted , it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to the world and would not miss any information.

In conclusion, it is not practical to prohibit cellphones in all public places. Some strategies can be applied to mitigate people’s concern about the inconvenience that cellphones might cause to them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2023-10-23 WXY8888 73 view
2021-06-20 chathurika2008@gmail.com 61 view
2021-05-17 husan shergill 89 view
Essays by user WXY8888 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether cellphones should be banned in public p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ve to be in tune with changes of market always. Missing out a piece of information mig...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... public place. When a cellphone is muted , it is still functioning.Therefore peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...hone is muted , it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hone is muted , it is still functioning.Therefore people could still feel connected to th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98587570621 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84661232796 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522598870056 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5600522298 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37483752795 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115367886357 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083170960335 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231350369479 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770188437391 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.